Page 152 - _21-0619 OK
P. 152

The International Journal of the Royal Society of Thailand
              Volume XII, 2020



                      The UN-IPCC addressed the social impact for the first time in 2014 with
              a chapter on “Livelihoods and Poverty” (UN-IPCC, 2014a: ch. 13). The major
              conclusions of this chapter were that “socially and economically disadvantaged

              and marginalized people are disproportionally affected by climate change”
              (UN-IPCC, 2014a: 796), but that the subject had thitherto been neglected: “Poverty
              dynamics are not sufficiently accounted for in current climate change research….
              Few  studies examine how  structural  inequalities, power  imbalances,  and
              intersecting axes of privilege and marginalization shape differential vulnerabilities
              to climate change.” (UN-IPCC, 2014a: 818-9)

                      In 2017, a UN working paper addressed the issue of climate change
              and inequality, summarizing the interaction as follows:
                      Available evidence indicates that this relationship is characterized by

                      a vicious cycle, whereby initial inequality causes the disadvantaged
                      groups to suffer disproportionately from the adverse effects of climate
                      change, resulting in greater subsequent inequality. The paper identifies
                      three main channels through which the inequality-aggravating effect of
                      climate change materializes, namely (a) increase in the exposure of the
                      disadvantaged groups to the adverse effects of climate change; (b) increase
                      in their susceptibility to damage caused by climate change; and (c) decrease
                      in their ability to cope and recover from the damage suffered. (Islam and
                      Winkel, 2017: 1)

                      This analysis recognized that the mechanisms that resulted in climate
              change weighing more heavily on the poor were both economic and political.
              On the latter, it proposed as follows:

                      In an unequal society, the advantaged groups (who own most of the
                      productive assets) usually “capture” or exert dominating influence on
                      the state and skew its policies in their favour. As a result, they can deploy
                      more of the public (state) resources for their protection against climate
                      hazard, leaving the disadvantaged groups less. (Islam and Winkel,
                      2017: 11)

                      The UNDP developed the same idea in its 2019 Human Development
              Report on inequality:  “Environmental inequalities are largely a choice, made by
              those with the power to choose” (UNDP, 2019: 192). However, the UN’s treatment
              of the political aspect necessarily remains rather formal, and does not engage




             144                                           Climate Change and Inequality in Southeast Asia:
                                                                          Review, Prospects, Priorities



                                                                                                   5/1/2565 BE   09:04
       _21-0619(137-154)8.indd   144
       _21-0619(137-154)8.indd   144                                                               5/1/2565 BE   09:04
   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157