Page 10 - The lraternational Journal of the Royal Society of Thailand.indd
P. 10

The International Journal of the Royal Society of Thailand
             Volume XV-2023




               a trend of junior researchers with less academic experience publishing fewer
               articles than their senior counterparts. In conclusions, Intensive paper mill clients
               exhibit distinct authorship profiles, detectable through descriptive analysis of
               their ego-centric co-authorship networks. The distinctive features in the Index

               Researchers’ authorship profiles were the high publication counts in their early
               careers and notably higher proportions of co-authors from specific regions.
               A thorough investigation of researchers displaying such profiles serves an
               important  initial  step  in  addressing  research  misconduct  and  enhancing

               integrity within academic communities.


             Keywords: authorship-for-sale; co-authorship network; research integrity; research
             misconduct; paper mill



             Introduction

                    Research misconduct has become a significant issue within the academic

             community, taking various forms over the years. While fabrication, falsification, and
             plagiarism, collectively referred to as FFP, are widely recognized and documented in
             countries with policies addressing research misconduct, less than 60% of these nations

             have  reported  other  forms  of  misconduct  (Resnik  et  al,  2015).  In  recent  years,
             systematic misconduct has emerged in the form of for-profit organizations known as

             paper mills, posing a challenge to academic integrity. These paper mills mass-produce
             publications and sell authorships to researchers seeking publication in peer-reviewed
             journals. Publications from paper mills involve a variety of unethical practices,

             such as FFP misconduct, false authorships, and the establishment of citation rings
             (Candal-Pedreira et al, 2022).

                    In academia, researchers often face substantial pressures stemming from

             multiple factors. These include the drive to achieve career advancement rewards, such
             as enhancing their reputation and elevating authorship metrics like the h-index
             (Teixeira Da Silva, 2021). At the same time, researchers may hold significant concerns

             about facing potential consequences if they fail to meet the academic expectations
             established by their respective affiliated institutions. Under these pressures, some
             researchers may have become embroiled in authorship-for-sale services offered by

             paper mills, with Thailand being no exception.






                                     A Potential Use of Ego-centric Co-authorship Network Analysis for
             2                       Inspecting Research Misconduct: A Case Study of Thai Researchers
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15