Page 87 - The lraternational Journal of the Royal Society of Thailand.indd
P. 87

The International Journal of the Royal Society of Thailand
                                                                                                Volume XV-2023



                     germinal center, then these large cells are positive for CD10, BCL6, and Ki-67 but
                     negative for BCL2 and MUM1. If it is an aggregate of large lymphoma B-cells, then
                     they can be evaluated for cell of origin according to Hans algorithm. Moreover,
                     the other 2 unstained slides can be used for c-myc (MYC protein) and cyclin D1
                     evaluation if needed.

                  3) Follow the essential diagnostic criteria given in the WHO-HAEM5 in order to
                     classify lymphoma (WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board, 2022) after
                     morphologic evaluation and immunostaining work-up above.

                         Using an effective approach in morphologic evaluation and even a limited
                  panel of immunostaining, the D&C of lymphoma can be given within an appropriate

                  rapid turnaround time (24-48 hours) under a good clinical correlation (Sukpanichnant,
                  2022). While targeted therapies improve clinical outcomes since anti-CD20 immuno-
                  therapy in the past 25+ years, advances in diagnostics for lymphoma and sophisticated

                  technics, especially in molecular studies, allow us to better understanding of lymphoma
                  as well as high-throughput workups. The author believes that a good histology is
                  still critical and concurs with Nathwani and colleagues about the important role of
                  histology in conjunction with a good clinical correlation to decide the most effective
                  way to gather information for a better management for individual patient care

                  (Nathwani et al, 2007).


                  Conclusion


                         There is no doubt that technology advances lead to better medical treatment
                  and care in history of humankind but along the way, some delays or misunderstandings
                  occur from time to time. The D&C of lymphoma is also an example of such experiences
                  as already shown in the aforementioned reflections but it will get better eventually and

                  that means the present practice using morphologic evaluation and immunostaining
                  will be more precise by more sophisticated technology that provides more useful
                  information for better patient care and quality of life. Anyway, in this interim, there is
                  no guarantee about the benefit of the high-throughput workups over the conventional

                  approach, using morphology and immunophenotype to the D&C of lymphoma with
                  an appropriate rapid turnaround time under a good clinical correlation.



                  Acknowledgements
                         The author Sanya Sukpanichnant is supported by Chalermphrakiat Grant,
                  Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University.







                        Sanya Sukpanichnant                                                               79
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92