Page 19 - The lraternational Journal of the Royal Society of Thailand.indd
P. 19

The International Journal of the Royal Society of Thailand
                                                                                                Volume XV-2023
































                  Figure 3 Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of ego, alter, and co-authorship network characteristics
                  of researchers affiliated with an organization in Thailand. A total of 120 researchers were included in
                  this analysis, derived from the 1  to the 4  social cycles of the index researcher IR_01 using snowball
                                                       th
                                               st
                  sampling. A) PCA plot for ego characteristics (time since the first publication, average annual publication
                  number during the past 5 years, journal domain diversity, and proportion of review/systematic review
                  articles), alter characteristics (proportions of co-authors affiliated with an organization in Thailand,
                  non-Thailand South-eastern Asia, Southern Asia, Western Asia and Eastern Europe), and co-authorship
                  network characteristics (number of co-authors during the past 5 years, edge density, number of
                  communities, and clustering coefficient). B) PCA plot for individual researchers. Most researchers
                  included in the analysis are represented by black circles, with the red and yellow triangles indicating
                  index researchers IR_01 and IR_02, respectively. Blue squares indicate high-performance junior
                  researchers (HJR_01, HJR_02, and HJR_03) with the smallest Euclidean distance to the index researcher
                  IR_01 on the plane of the first two PCA dimensions. Green squares represent senior researchers (SR_01,
                  SR_02, and SR_03) with the lowest coordinates on the second dimension. Details of abbreviations in
                  Panel A were shown in Table S1.


                         Among  all  the  researchers  included,  the  most  distinctive  feature  of  the
                  authorship profiles of both Index Researchers was their noticeably higher proportion
                  of co-authors from Eastern Europe, exceeding 7.5%, while other researchers had less
                  than 1.25% (Figure 4J). While the authorship profiles that distinguished both Index
                  Researchers and High-performance Junior Researchers from Senior Researchers were

                  the proportions of co-authors from Southern Asia (Figure 4H) and Western Asia
                  (Figure 4I). In contrast, differentiating Index Researchers and Senior Researchers based
                  on other authorship profile aspects, such as the structures of co-authorship networks
                  (number of communities and clustering coefficient) (Figures 4E & 4F), proportions of
                  review articles (Figure 4D), or the diversity of research domains (Figure 4G), turned
                  out to be challenging.




                        Phrutsamon Wongnak et al.                                                         11
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24