Page 31 - _21-0619 OK
P. 31

The International Journal of the Royal Society of Thailand
                                                                                         Volume XII, 2020



                King and the government. On 12 March, Prime Minister Manopakorn Nititada
                informed parliament of King Prajatibok's opinions on Luang Praditmanutham's
                economic project, which was said to include communist elements. Some members

                of parliament who supported Luang Pradit brought their guns to the parliamentary
                sessions on 30, 31  March 1933, preventing the parliament from carrying out its
                                   st
                governmental function. The military took control of parliament. On 1 April 1933,
                a “2476 law (1933) against communists” was announced. As a reaction, the
                government dismissed several ministers that were suspected to be communists
                and appointed a new cabinet. Finally, on 2 April, the parliament was dissolved.

                        The  Siamese  government  used  the  opportunity  to  drive  Luang
                Praditmanutham out of the country. Apparently, several members of the
                government (Major Phraya Songsuradej and Mr. Prayun Pamornmontri – หััวหัน้้าคือ
                พััน้เอก พัระยาทรงสุุรเดช และน้ายประยูร ภมรมน้ติรี) used King Prajatibok, who was not
                agreed with Luang Pradit's economic plan, to achieve their political goals and
                dispose Luang Pradit politically. In a published document, the King criticized
                Luang Pradit's  economic  plan  heavily,  saying it closely  resembled Stalin's
                Russian plan. Siam, he wrote, Siam would not profit from such a project, which
                would only cause confusion in the country.  The Dutch emissary in Bangkok
                                                                6
                expressed similar opinions: although Luang Pradit was no communist, there
                was no doubt that his economic plan contained communist elements.  Also the
                                                                                           7
                American emissary took the same view: “…there has been a growth of communist
                activities in Siam since the change in government last June (1932: the author),
                but this is the first serious attempt on the part of a member of the government to

                introduce communistic or socialistic ideas…” (Sombat Chantarawong, Nakarin
                Mektrairat, Prajak Kongkiet, 2007: 86)









                  Chai-Anan Samuttawanich and Kattiya Kannasut, 1975. Documents on Politics and Government
                6
                  in Thailand. Bangkok: Thai Social Science Association, 278, 354, 356
                  Quoted in: Sombat Chantarawong, Nakarin Mektrairat, Prajak Kongkiet, 2007. The World and
                7
                  the Reign of King Prajatibok, 92. The English original reads: “Recently the cooperation in Parliament
                  to contemplate on Government policy was lost, because Luang Pradit Manudham submitted a
                  plan for economic development based completely on communist principles... Luang Pradit is
                  no communist but a fanatical idealist who wants to serve his country. He has studied in Europe
                  and now thinks he can implement communism on Siam. …”



                                                                                                    23
                    Pornsan Watanangura



                                                                                                   5/1/2565 BE   09:03
       _21-0619(019-054)3.indd   23
       _21-0619(019-054)3.indd   23                                                                5/1/2565 BE   09:03
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36