Page 182 - _21-0619 OK
P. 182

The International Journal of the Royal Society of Thailand
              Volume XII, 2020



              very big gap between the top 20 per cent and the next 20 per cent, even though
              we can guess that those at the top are more likely to have concealed their
              real wealth. There are some problems with these official data, but other sources

              confirm the pattern. Duangmanee Laovakul has made the first nationwide
              analysis of land distribution based on land titles. Her study shows a very
              skewed distribution of land with a Gini Index of a staggering 0.88. The top tenth
              own 61 per cent of all titled land. The bottom tenth own 0.1 per cent. The biggest
              landholder has 100,000 hectares. Duangmanee (2016a; 2016b) makes a strong
              case for taxing wealth on grounds of efficiency and equity.


              Inequality, Politics and Instability

                      Political conflicts in the last decade has made Thai politics unstable.
              The World Bank (2016) noted that in the past the Thai economy could maintain
              high economic growth rates even in the throes of a series of coups. But since
              the early 2000s, political instability has hurt economic growth for many years.
              Governance indices—especially on freedom of expression, accountability and
              political stability—have all declined, while the trend in Thailand’s neighbors
              has been opposite. The Thai bureaucracy used to act as a cushion to any political
              difficulties, but its quality and effectiveness have declined. The World Bank
              cautioned that Thailand may not be able to achieve the goal of inclusive growth,
              and predicted that poverty and inequality will continue to be Thailand’s major
              challenges in the near future. The World Bank suggested that the Thai government
              should consider supporting the bottom 40 percent of households via subsidies

              on education, employment and social security (World Bank, 2016).
                      In the last few years, the refusal to address the issues of income and wealth
              inequality in Thailand has partially dissolved. Promoting equality now figures

              in the national plan. The mainstream think tank has made studies and policy
              proposals (TDRI, 2015). Political parties have included the issue in their electoral
              programs.
                      This shift is partly a reflection of the international debates on the issue.
              More significantly, it is a result of Thailand’s political conflict of the past decade.
              Some people (but not all) have realized that inequality lies behind this conflict in

              some way. Kobsak Pootrakul, a member of the National Assembly in 2015,







             174                                                               Inequality and Policy




                                                                                                   5/1/2565 BE   09:05
       _21-0619(167-184)10.indd   174                                                              5/1/2565 BE   09:05
       _21-0619(167-184)10.indd   174
   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187