สำนักราชบัณฑิตยสภา

«“√ “√ √“™∫— ≥±‘ µ¬ ∂“π ªï ∑’Ë ÛÒ ©∫— ∫∑’Ë Ú ‡¡.¬.-¡‘ .¬. ÚıÙ˘ Somchai Durongdej 471 • Who were benefited by the above activities? - Executive committee members - Implementing officers of the healthy city - Administrative com- mittee members at the district level • Example of institutional capacity building (same as above) - The executive com- mittee in BMA visited the healthy city project in Australia to expand their views and exchange of their experiences with the key persons of healthy city project in - The implementing of- ficers visited the healthy cities in Malaysia and Singapore - On the job training for implementing officers from dif- ferent districts on the concepts and direction of healthy city - Organization of the workshop for management com- mittee at the district levels on indicators for evaluating healthy city • How was the integration of the social, economic, environ- mental and cultural elements of sustainability achieved? A fully integration of all elements have not yet been successfully achieved but many attempt have been experiment by focus on the integrative approach of the projects with input con- tributed by social, economic and environmental sectors to review the problems and formulate the plan for mutual implementation. • How were resources leve- raged? Utilize the resources already allocated to different sectors • How was cost recovery employed? Not applicable • How is dependence on external resources addressed? Not applicable • Is there a time-line for achieving self-sufficiency? Not applicable 5. Key questions towards bet- ter performance • What were the major con- straints in starting and imple- mentation? - During the initiation of the project, the major constraint was on understanding the con- cepts of healthy city. - During the implement- ation, the major problem was on integration of different sectors and budget allocation to accommodate and integrative projects. More im- portantly, it is difficulty to convey the concept into action among the personnel in BMA. • Have they been overcome and, if so, how? Conventionally a signi- ficant measure to overcome the problems of misunderstanding and ignorance is to provide train- ing for officers who work in different sectors on continuous basis. One of the most important measures is to inform adminis- trative officers in different districts about healthy city concepts and the setting approaches. • If problem remain, what are they? 1. Community participa- tion and intersectoral approaches for implementation 2. Formulation of proper indicators for evaluating the heal- thy city performance • Suggest changes for bet- ter performance - Top policy person should establish a firm policy on healthy city and committed to the development of city with this initiative. This policy should be clear and permanent system of operation be established so that it will not terminate with the end of the political term. - It must be recognized that one of the key elements to successful implementation is the effort of community participation and partnership. - Gathering of civil so- ciety must be supported to jointly analyze the policy and identify direction for more effective im- plementation. - Empowerment of com- munity leaders for more under- standing of the healthy city con- cepts and measures to improve the healthy city. - Identification of proper indicators for evaluating the im- plementation of healthy city in Bangkok. These indicators should