สำนักราชบัณฑิตยสภา

«“√ “√ √“™∫— ≥±‘ µ¬ ∂“π °’ √µ‘ ∫ÿ ≠‡®◊ Õ 1103 ªï ∑’Ë ÛÒ ©∫— ∫∑’Ë Ù µ.§.-∏.§. ÚıÙ˘ Abstract Deliberation in Empedocles’ Philosophy Kirti Bunchua Fellow of the Academy of Moral and Political Sciences, The Royal Institute, Thailand It is a logical sequence to expect that the doctrine of reincarnation should be followed by its solution, i.e. the doctrine about the status of deliverance and the means to reach such status. Empedocles is a philosopher of compromise: compromising the various schools of philosophy. He is also a founder of a new religion for the Greeks of his time. He fulfills well his duty in this respect by compromising his concept of the Supreme or God with his philosophy. It is, therefore, more than appropriate to conclude with the doctrine of the deliverance. Key words : Greek Philosophy, Empedocles, deliberation, reincarnation, God, Divine Sphere, compromise »— æ∑å µà “ßª√–‡∑»∑’Ë „™â §”‰∑¬·∑π‰¥â §”∑—Ë « Ê ‰ª∑’Ë §π‰∑¬π‘ ¬¡æŸ ¥∑— ∫»— æ∑å “¡“√∂∑’Ë ®–°”À𥧔‰∑¬„™â ·∑π‰¥â ¥— ßπ—È π §≥–°√√¡°“√ ª√–¡«≈»— æ∑å µà “ßª√–‡∑»∑’Ë „™â §”‰∑¬·∑π‰¥â ·Àà ß√“™∫— ≥±‘ µ¬ ∂“π ®÷ ߉¥â æ‘ ®“√≥“√«∫√«¡§”µà “ߪ√–‡∑»∑’Ë „™â §”‰∑¬·∑π‰¥â æ√â Õ¡∑—È ß¬°µ— «Õ¬à “ߪ√–‚¬§∑’Ë ¡’ °“√„™â §”µà “ߪ√–‡∑» ·≈–ª√–‚¬§∑’Ë „™â §”‰∑¬·∑π‰¥â ‚¥¬‡¢’ ¬π ∑— ∫»— æ∑å §”¥— ß°≈à “«‡ªì π¿“…“‰∑¬µ“¡‡ ’ ¬ß∑’Ë §π‰∑¬ à «π„À≠à ÕÕ°‡ ’ ¬ß§”π—È π Ê ´÷Ë ß‰¡à µ√ßµ“¡À≈— °‡°≥±å °“√ ∑— ∫»— æ∑å ¢Õß√“™∫— ≥±‘ µ¬ ∂“𠇙à π ‡√◊Ë Õß«√√≥¬ÿ °µå ·≈–°“√‡∑’ ¬∫µ— «Õ— °…√ ·µà ¬— ߧß√— °…“‡§â “‡¥‘ ¡¢Õß√Ÿ ª§”„π ¿“…“‡¥‘ ¡‰«â ‡™à π campaign ·§¡‡ª≠ √≥√ß§å °√–∑√«ß “∏“√≥ ÿ ¢ ·§¡‡ª≠ „Àâ ª√–™“™πÕÕ°°”≈— ß°“¬‡æ◊Ë Õ ÿ ¢¿“æ °√–∑√«ß “∏“√≥ ÿ ¢ √≥√ß§å „Àâ ª√–™“™πÕÕ°°”≈— ß°“¬‡æ◊Ë Õ ÿ ¢¿“æ fastfood øÑ “ µå øŸÑ ¥ Õ“À“√®“π¥à «π ‡¢“™Õ∫°‘ π øÑ “ µå øÑŸ ¥ ‡æ√“–‡√Á «∑— π„® ‡¢“™Õ∫°‘ π Õ“À“√®“π¥à «π ‡æ√“–‡√Á «∑— π„® obsolete Õä Õ∫‚´À≈’ µ æâ π ¡— ¬/‡≈‘ °„™â ª√–‡æ≥’ §≈ÿ ¡∂ÿ ß™π Õä Õ∫‚´À≈’ µ ·≈â « ª√–‡æ≥’ §≈ÿ ¡∂ÿ ß™π æâ π ¡— ¬/‡≈‘ °„™â ·≈â «